跳转到主内容

CP与XCP、以下哪一项速度更快？

  1. 最后更新
  2. 另存为PDF
Views:
33
Visibility:
Public
Votes:
0
Category:
netapp-xcp
Specialty:
nas
Last Updated:

适用场景

  • XCP

问题解答

  • 虽然XCP比Find快很多倍、但du、cp或rsync要快很多；XCP使用的CPU和内存要多得多。为了提高搜寻的性能、使用更快的CPU以及提高其他任务(筛选、复制等)的性能、请使用具有大量内存的多核系统； 复制一个包含数百万个文件的大型深树可能需要在运行XCP的系统上使用几GB的RAM；因此、数据包跟踪可能不是比较这些工具的好方法、因为还有许多其他变量和因素会影响这些进程。

追加信息

NetApp provides no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or reliability or serviceability of any information or recommendations provided in this publication or with respect to any results that may be obtained by the use of the information or observance of any recommendations provided herein. The information in this document is distributed AS IS and the use of this information or the implementation of any recommendations or techniques herein is a customer's responsibility and depends on the customer's ability to evaluate and integrate them into the customer's operational environment. This document and the information contained herein may be used solely in connection with the NetApp products discussed in this document.